Peer Review Process

Our journal is engaged in a double-anonymous peer review process. In this process, we strive to match the expertise of a reviewer with the submitted manuscript. Reviews are completed with evidence of thoughtful engagement with the manuscript, provide constructive feedback, and add value to the overall knowledge and information presented in the manuscript.

Mission: The mission of the peer review process is to achieve excellence and rigour in scholarly publications and research.

Values: The journal values diverse perspectives from the discipline and reviewers who provide critical, constructive, and respectful feedback to our authors. Reviewers come from a variety of backgrounds, careers, and organizations from around the world.

Ethics: All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews have be kept confidential. Reviewers must not share their review or information about the review process with anyone without the agreement of the editors and authors involved, even after publication. This also applies to other reviewers’ “comments to author” which are shared with you on decision.